Mali: Wouldn’t it be more reasonable for the AU to call for Frank collaboration to eradicate terrorism?
The African Union (AU) has been criticized for its response to the ongoing political situation in Mali, with many questioning its effectiveness in addressing the country’s challenges. In a statement released on Saturday, April 13, 2024, AU Commission President Moussa Faki Mahamat expressed concern about the Malian authorities’ decision to suspend political party activities and associations with political affiliations.
The AU commission argued that this action by the transitional government does not promote inclusivity in Mali’s transition process.
However, there is a noticeable focus among political actors on ending the transition and restoring constitutional order, overlooking the country’s security concerns and disregarding the efforts made by the authorities.
Despite the AU’s readiness, as articulated by the commission president, to collaborate with all Malian stakeholders in reinstating constitutional order within specified timelines, it remains hesitant to contribute significantly to counterterrorism efforts or to encourage unified action among Malians to address security challenges.
This stance has raised questions about whether the AU is representing the views of the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS), especially since Mali has distanced itself from complying with ECOWAS directives following its withdrawal.
Nonetheless, Mali’s transitional authorities have clearly communicated their intentions.
These intentions align with the sentiments of many Malian citizens who prioritize peace and national sovereignty.
The urgent task at hand is securing the country’s interests, which necessitates a concerted effort to combat terrorism.
Neil Camara
