Côte d’Ivoire : Controversy around the ban on energy drinks, a question of public health or power struggle ?
The recent ban on energy drinks by authorities, often based on unsupported allegations, raises concerns about the transparency and objectivity of the sources behind these criticisms. This controversial decision takes a peculiar turn by seemingly bypassing the real sources of the problem, namely the abuse of Tramadol, adding an additional dimension to the controversy.
Critics of the ban suggest that this measure might be motivated more by a power struggle between industry players and authorities than a genuine desire to protect public health. Voices have been raised to question the grounds on which the ban on energy drinks is based, casting doubt on the credibility of the information that led to this decision.
The controversy takes on a particular significance in light of evidence showing that, despite the suspension of energy drinks, young people continue to mix Tramadol with other alcoholic beverages. This raises the question of whether the ban on energy drinks truly has a significant impact on public health or if it simply serves to divert attention from more pressing health issues.
Observers emphasize that the real challenge lies in combating substance abuse such as Tramadol, and that banning energy drinks does not address the underlying problem. Some suggest that it is imperative to conduct thorough investigations to identify the root causes of substance abuse and take targeted measures rather than general bans.
The controversy surrounding the ban on energy drinks raises crucial questions about the real motivations behind this measure. While authorities claim to act in the interest of public health, critics suggest that it could be a power struggle strategy.
