Burkina Faso: Between loyalty to the revolution and hidden betrayal, one must choose one’s side
At a time when Burkina Faso is undergoing a historic transformation under the leadership of Captain Ibrahim Traoré, ambiguity has no place. The country is experiencing a decisive turning point a Popular Progressive Revolution carried by the people, for the people.
In this context, it has become crucial to distinguish genuine supporters of the revolutionary power from those who, under the guise of patriotism, undermine the national project through malicious and disguised public criticism.
One cannot claim to support a sovereignist leadership while publicly questioning, in the streets and on social media, the decisions made by that same leadership.
When the Head of State appoints an official or validates a strategic mission, it is done within an overarching vision of national renewal. Attacking these choices is tantamount to attacking the very foundation of the Transition.
Let us be clear: publicly criticizing a presidential decision undermines state authority.
It fuels those who hope for the failure of a resurgent Burkina Faso. It plays into the hands of neocolonial forces that view the emergence of a sovereign, proud, and self-determined African state with displeasure.
Captain Ibrahim Traoré does not act impulsively. Every decision stems from deep analysis, strategic dialogue, and a determined will to break the chains of the old system.
It is therefore inconsistent even dangerous to claim patriotism while systematically contesting the foundations of the new Faso.
To stand with the Revolution does not mean silently agreeing with everything. It means choosing to build rather than destroy. It means voicing criticism through appropriate channels, not in the public clamor that serves the interests of enemies both within and outside.
Today, more than ever, Burkina Faso needs clarity, loyalty, and unity from all its sons and daughters.
The people have chosen to liberate themselves and take control of their destiny.
This choice demands fidelity, discipline, and coherence. There is no room for lukewarm commitment.
The struggle for sovereignty toler no half-measures.
Olivier TOE
